2026-01-26 4 min read

Notes, 2026-01-26

Notes, 2026-01-26
Justus von Liebig's 1837 instructions for blowing your own Kaliapparat, a tool for analyzing the carbon content of organic compounds. In historian Catherine Jackson's telling, this instrument helped establish small-scale, homemade glassware as the go-to tool for chemists in the mid-nineteenth century. Image via Catherine Jackson, The Wonderful Properties of Glass.

One of the joys of reading history is the sense of perfect clarity that it sometimes offers. You might begin with a question about why such-and-such technology developed as it did. Perhaps you’ve got hunches about the answer, but perhaps they feel just a little too neat. Like any thoughtful person you know not to trust your hunches too much, and as you begin your research you find that yes, your hunches are notionally correct, but also no, they don’t capture the full picture. With each new historical source you piece the full picture together in the same way that the proverbial blind men piece together their collective understanding of the proverbial elephant. One historical detail might align with one of your hunches, while another historical detail might align with another. There may come a moment, then, when your sense of the history is disjointed, multifaceted, complex. But if you push through, and keep reading the history, then sometimes you reach what feels like a moment of perfect clarity.

It’s a good idea, at least — that it is possible to truly understand history. That the past makes sense, and that you can make sense of it too.

SPONSORED

Catch critical design issues early with DRCY, AllSpice's AI design review agent. It runs first-pass checks on schematics and datasheets to flag config errors, voltage mismatches, and more — so hardware engineers spend less time on rechecks, more time innovating.

Learn more

I did not read much history over the end-of-year holidays, focusing instead on Roberto Bolaño’s 2666, Rick Rubin’s The Creative Act, and Anthony Bourdain’s Kitchen Confidential. Of these I found Kitchen Confidential to be the most entertaining and informative, but I appreciated The Creative Act for its meditative, liberating, and honestly fluffy characteristics. I listened to each of these books as I meticulously cleaned, sanded, cleaned again, primed, and re-painted about nine hundred square feet of flooring in my home, a project that itself was meditative and liberating too. I cut all my edges sans masking tape, staged the work in zones so that I could still use the house while the project was active, and quickly touched up scores of wall scuffs with a lightly-loaded roller. I also learned about and used sugar soap, which is often used to clean painted surfaces before repainting and which usually does not contain sugar. It was, in all, a highly satisfying experience, and one that I’m surprised to say I’ll look forward to doing again in the future.

Returning to my “normal” routine in January, I picked up my copy of Hasok Chang’s Inventing Temperature, which the SOW Reading Group is working its way through now. The book goes into incredible historical detail, explaining at length scientific ideas that have been out of vogue for centuries or more. It’s a little strange to learn so much about long-dead theories, but nevertheless I’m enjoying the book, and learning a surprising amount about how mushy and imprecise even the most basic physical benchmarks are. For instance, it turns out that water can, without too much effort, be heated to 110°C or even 120°C without boiling. This is weird; the systems we use to measure temperature are based on physical phenomena that are not firmly fixed. It’s weird too that temperature itself has a bounded quality: Absolute zero is a theoretical state which cannot be reached or surpassed, and Planck Temperature (the hottest possible temperature, at which point the wavelength of emitted light reaches Planck length) is a firm limit on how hot things can get. Thermal energy is not something you can have infinitely much of, and nor is it possible to have none of it at all.

Scope Creep.


Thanks as always to SOW's paid subscribers for making this newsletter possible.

Be in touch,
Spencer

Spencer Wright
Spencer Wright
Spencer Wright is the (mostly accidental) founder of Scope of Work, which he started writing (as The Prepared) in 2013. Today he serves as its editor-in-chief and chief dilettante.
Great! You’ve successfully signed up.
Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.
You've successfully subscribed to Scope of Work.
Your link has expired.
Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.
Success! Your billing info has been updated.
Your billing was not updated.